Posted by admin on March 30, 2011 under Google, Link Building, SEM, SEO, Social Networking | 
If there wasn’t enough to worry about with Google’s Social Search project that has been looming about in various pieces for a while now, Google just announced that it will be launching Google +1. Essentially this gives the searcher an opportunity (when logged in) to click a +1 button next to a search result. This will then show websites that people +1′d in your network and also sites that they have themselves +1′d previously. Not only do the organic search results get this +1 attention, but so do the paid listings. Advertisers should start freaking out…..now.
Exactly how this new +1 feature will possibly skew results, if any, is unknown. One would assume that if a site is neck and neck with a competitor, but one has more +1 votes, it just may be an algorithm attribute taken into consideration to push a site into the higher slot. If it’s not going to be used that way, then what’s the point? This was Google’s answer to the Facebook Like button, but there is also an upcoming feature that will allow webmasters to incorporate the +1 button onto their website as well. Will that functionality pull the +1 data from the SERP’s and input them there and vice versa? Will a click on the website +1 button add a “vote” to the SERP listing?
The ad part is the most disconcerting and especially for new advertisers that don’t have any established votes. You can see what a site that has received multiple votes looks like on this new report from Search Engine Land that covers this new feature in somewhat good detail, but it raises more questions than it answers. While it’s understood what it’s supposed to do and why it’s there when looked at in comparison to the Facebook Like button, what it doesn’t explain is exactly how Google plans to use the +1 feature. Will it be used as part of their algorithm, even if very minutely? Will it have an effect on Adwords or factored in as part of the Google Quality Score? How much of a frenzy will it create when CTR’s start taking a dramatic upward spike due to “accidental” click-throughs?
Regardless of how you feel, it’s coming and is being pushed out in waves. If you don’t see it in your results, but want to take part of this experiment, head over to http://www.google.com/experimental/index.html and opt in. SEO experts should probably consider clicking on their client websites sooner rather than later to get the jump on competition. How skewed can this data get and how will they monitor these “votes” for legitimacy? Or will it be yet one more back alley tactic that black hats will start using somehow to their advantage. Since we don’t yet know the full implication, all we can do is start clicking as much as possible because it will be used. We just don’t know for what or even why.
Posted by admin on February 14, 2011 under Bing, Google, Link Building, Search Engines, SEO, Yahoo! |
I’ve done SEO for many years now and I’ve always adhered to the rules and guidelines set forth by Google, Yahoo and Bing (aka MSN aka Live). However, there’s nothing more frustrating then when you have a client that is in a very competitive market and their competitors are breaking all of the rules and appear to get away with it. Their competitors are at the top of the rankings and a lot of which got there by illegal means and by illegal I’m referring to illegal in Google’s eyes, such as hiring linking companies to spread their links to thousands of websites (most not even relevant), buying one way paid links, and not even trying to look natural. They win and prosper and never get caught.
The topic came up again over the weekend as covered by the lovely Vanessa Fox about how major retailer JCPenney broke those rules and had enjoyed top rankings on Google for pretty much everything they sold and in turn had a very prosperous holiday shopping season. JCPenney is not a small company and were certainly not prospering “in the shadows”. They were caught because of a New York Times article where the writer hired an SEO company to find out just how JCPenney performed its SEO magic. The writer found that JCPenney had been buying links, supposedly inadvertently through their SEO firm, on literally thousands of websites and most of which weren’t even relevant to JCPenney. When the Times questioned Google’s Matt Cutts about the issue, he released a very short, “Google’s algorithms had started to work. Manual action also taken.” The result was JCPenney’s rankings taking a major plummet, but Twitter came alive with questions about why it took a New York Times investigation and a tap on Google’s shoulder for them to notice this had been going on. Vanessa’s article covers it in more detail here and it’s a great read, but it raises important concerns to all legitimate SEO experts.
SEO professionals have had enough. We all have had those clients that are in competitive fields and experience this first hand. We see a clients’ competitor sit at the top of Google rankings that are only there from beating the system. We see them buy links, appear on hundreds of irrelevant sites (some even pornographic) and they win the battle. Meanwhile, we have to tell our clients, “I can’t do that. You need to consider the penalties. If you get caught, you could be removed from Google’s index. They’ll eventually get caught. You’ll see….“ and then months later, even years later, they’re never caught. They just continue to prosper and our clients go elsewhere. Most of the time to black hat SEO hobbyists that give them what they want. Top rankings via whatever means necessary. If clients are smart, they will steer clear away from this type of activity, but the question truly is, when will Google figure out how to spot this?
Someone explain why Google ignores legitimate SEO professionals pleas? The graphic below is from the aforementioned post that showed how many links JCPenney had from month to month. Why can’t Google see this activity and why don’t they act on it? As mentioned before, JCPenney is not a small company, and they still don’t get caught unless something like this occurs. Maybe Google can explain to us how they don’t see this activity below? Google’s algorithm brags that it analyzes 10,000 ranking factors to determine positioning. Is this not one of them? There’s not one SEO professional that hasn’t struggled getting a client to rank following the rules while we watched their competitors flourish by breaking them. All we had to do is use SEO Elite to see the origin of their links. Does Google not have something similar? Do we have to tattle-tale on sites for them to get caught? It’s time for this hole to be patched and thankfully it takes an embarrassing slip like this to bring it back to light.
